Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees implement.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the realized counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is founded as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of legislation, it is the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the varied penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct is not suitable even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful fashion. Read more
However it is made obvious that police is free to take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also make sure respect of the family lose in accordance with law and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate for a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become realized. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated over. Read more
During the United States, persons are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember 1 rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case law or precedent in court read more documents: be as specific as you can, leading the court, not only to the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it really is convenient for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got achieved into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's arrived at these kinds of stage. Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to evaluate the benefit of all of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who will be found for being most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed by the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part with the respondent department.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal on the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. When the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this style of law strives to form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
8. To the reasons stated above, this court finds the petition to become without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend inside the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, can also be dismissed. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are proven by executive businesses based on statutes.